Being an effective peer reviewer is critical to the success of any academic journal,
as peer review strengthens published manuscripts by providing unbiased feedback to
authors, allowing them to improve their work prior to acceptance. The best peer reviewers
possess a solid knowledge of the manuscript's subject, understand the peer review
process and have strong writing skills. In an effort to improve the quality of peer
reviews for Academic Radiology, the key components of writing an effective review are briefly discussed.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
REFERENCES
- How to review a manuscript: a “Down-to-Earth” approach.Acad Psychiatry. 2004; 28: 81-87
- A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 848-854
- A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.BMC Med. 2019; 17: 118
- How to review a manuscript.J Electrocard. 2016; 49: 109-111
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 09, 2023
Accepted:
January 1,
2023
Received in revised form:
January 1,
2023
Received:
November 20,
2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
