Becoming an Effective Manuscript Reviewer

Published:January 09, 2023DOI:
      Being an effective peer reviewer is critical to the success of any academic journal, as peer review strengthens published manuscripts by providing unbiased feedback to authors, allowing them to improve their work prior to acceptance. The best peer reviewers possess a solid knowledge of the manuscript's subject, understand the peer review process and have strong writing skills. In an effort to improve the quality of peer reviews for Academic Radiology, the key components of writing an effective review are briefly discussed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Roberts LW
        • Coverdale J
        • Edenharder K
        • et al.
        How to review a manuscript: a “Down-to-Earth” approach.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2004; 28: 81-87
        • Provenzale JM
        • Stanley RJ
        A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 848-854
        • Glonti K
        • Cauchi D
        • Cobo E
        • et al.
        A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
        BMC Med. 2019; 17: 118
        • Hill JA
        How to review a manuscript.
        J Electrocard. 2016; 49: 109-111