Advertisement
Original Investigation|Articles in Press

The Gender Gap in Interventional Radiology: Barriers, Opportunities, and the Role of the Integrated IR Residency

Published:March 02, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.008

      Rationale and Objectives

      To review the gender gap in Interventional Radiology (IR) and explore the role of the Integrated IR residency.

      Materials and Methods

      A retrospective review of gender demographic data of medical school applicants to Integrated IR residency from 2016-2021, and active residents/fellows (“trainees”) in IR and peer specialties from 2007 to 2021.

      Results

      Women comprised 21.0% of medical student applicants to the Integrated IR residency in the 2020-21 academic year, versus 12.9% of Diagnostic Radiology (DR) resident applicants to the Independent IR residency; these figures have stayed relatively constant since 2016-17 and represent a statistically significantly difference (p=0.000044). The Integrated pathway has become the dominant source of IR trainees, growing from 4.4% in 2016-17 to 76.3% in 2020-21 (p=0.0013). From 2007 to 2021, the percentage of all IR trainees who were female grew from 10.5% to 20.3% (p=0.005). From 2017 to 2021, the percentage of Integrated IR residents who were female grew from 13.3% to 22.0% (p=0.053, 19.1% year-over-year growth), and has been higher than the percentage of female Independent IR residents (p=0.048).

      Conclusion

      Women continue to be underrepresented in IR, though this gender gap is improving. The Integrated IR residency appears to have majorly contributed to this improvement, consistently supplying more women into the IR pipeline than through the fellowship/Independent IR residency. Women are significantly better represented among current Integrated IR residents than Independent residents. The now-dominant Integrated IR pathway must increase women recruitment for continued gender gap improvement.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      IR (Interventional Radiology), DR (Diagnostic Radiology), AAMC (Association of American Medical Colleges), SIR (Society of Interventional Radiology), VIR (Vascular and Interventional Radiology), ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education), ERAS (Electronic Residency Application Service)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Applicants, Matriculants, Enrollment, and Graduates to U.S. Medical Schools, 2011-2012 through 2020-2021.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2020 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2019.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2020 (Available at:) (Accessed July 27, 2021)
        • Higgins MCSS
        • Hwang W-T
        • Richard C
        • et al.
        Underrepresentation of women and minorities in the United States IR academic physician workforce.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27: 1837-1844.e2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.011
        • Li O
        • Ross M
        • Wiseman D.
        Women in interventional radiology: exploring the gender disparity in Canada.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021; 50: 115-118https://doi.org/10.1067/J.CPRADIOL.2020.02.007
        • Foo M
        • Maingard J
        • Wang M
        • et al.
        Women in interventional radiology: insights into Australia's gender gap.
        Clin Radiol. 2020; 75: e1-560.e7https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRAD.2020.03.030
        • Wah TM
        • Belli AM.
        The Interventional Radiology (IR) gender gap: a prospective online survey by the cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of Europe (CIRSE).
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018; 41: 1241-1253https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1967-3
        • Rohilla M
        • Wadhwa V
        • Purushothaman R
        • Vilanilam GK
        • Lewis PS
        • Wong K.
        Pediatric interventional radiology workforce in North America: a descriptive analysis of demographics, educational backgrounds and scholarly activities.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51: 2077-2082https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05014-x
        • Wadhwa V
        • Vilanilam GK
        • Malhotra A
        • Lamparello NA.
        Descriptive analysis of interventional radiology residency program directors in the United States.
        Clin Imaging. 2020; 68: 232-235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.012
        • Tsugawa Y
        • Jena AB
        • Figueroa JF
        • John Orav E
        • Blumenthal DM
        • Jha AK
        Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 206-213https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875
        • Rosenkrantz AB
        • Englander MJ
        • Deipolyi AR
        • Findeiss L
        • Duszak RJ.
        Clinical practice patterns of interventional radiologists by gender.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 213: 867-874https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21321
        • Jaschke W
        • Bartal G
        • Trianni A
        • Belli A-M.
        Fighting the gender gap in interventional radiology: facts and fiction relating to radiation.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018; 41: 1254-1256https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1968-2
        • Englander MJ
        • Ghatan C.
        Radiation and the pregnant IR: myth versus fact.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021; 44: 877-882https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02704-1
        • Marx MV.
        Baby on board: managing occupational radiation exposure during pregnancy.
        Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 21: 32-36https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.007
        • Englander MJ
        • O'Horo SK
        journal club: women in interventional radiology: how are we doing?.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 211: 724-729https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.19938
        • Wang M
        • Laguna B
        • Koethe Y
        • Lehrman E
        • Kumar V
        • Kohi MP.
        Bridging the gender gap in the society of IR: a benchmark study.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30: 584-588.e2https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVIR.2018.09.007
        • Garg T
        • Bajaj S
        • Dayan MJ
        • et al.
        Temporal and geospatial variations among the interventional radiology physician workforce in the United States.
        Clin Imaging. 2021; 78: 105-109https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.013
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        ERAS Statistics.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
        ACGME Data Resource Book.
        Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Society of Interventional Radiology
        Women in IR.
        Society of Interventional Radiology, Fairfax, VA2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Englander MJ
        • Ghatan CE
        • Hamilton BN
        • Josephs SC
        • Nelson KJ
        • Traube LE.
        Society of interventional radiology position statement on parental leave.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28: 993-994https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.04.006
        • Society of Interventional Radiology
        Pregnancy Toolkit.
        Society of Interventional Radiology, Fairfax, VA2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Bishay V
        • Young L
        • Ranade M
        • Fischman A
        • Lookstein R.
        Lack of exposure and percieved occupational hazards as barriers to entry into IR for women: a survey of 143 female medical students.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28: S20-S21https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVIR.2016.12.629
        • American Board of Medical Specialties
        American Board of Medical Specialties Policy on Parental, Caregiver and Medical Leave During Training.
        American Board of Medical Specialties, Chicago, IL2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • American Board of Radiology
        Residency Leave Policy.
        American Board of Radiology, Tucson, AZ2021 (Available at:) (Accessed February 14, 2022)
        • Goldman D
        • Martin J
        • Bercu Z
        • Newsome J
        • Grimm L.
        Differential motivations for pursuing interventional radiology: implications for residency recruitment.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16: 82-88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.002
        • Abelson JS
        • Chartrand G
        • Moo TA
        • Moore M
        • Yeo H.
        The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015.
        Am J Surg. 2016; 212: 566-572https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.012
        • Bennett CL
        • Baker O
        • Rangel EL
        • Marsh RH.
        The gender gap in surgical residencies.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 893-894https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2171
        • Dageforde LA
        • Kibbe M
        • Jackson GP.
        Recruiting women to vascular surgery and other surgical specialties.
        J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 262-267https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2012.07.029