Advertisement
Education, Residents & Fellows|Articles in Press

Results of the 2021-2022 Survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology

Published:February 20, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.022

      Rationale and Objectives

      An annual survey of chief residents in accredited North American radiology programs is conducted by the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A3CR

      Hoegger MJ, Shetty AS, Denner DR, et al. A Snapshot of Radiology Training During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):607-613. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 29. PMID: 32690337; PMCID: PMC7322484.

      ). Special topics surveyed for the 2021-2022 academic year were procedural competency and virtual radiology education in the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to summarize the 2021-2022 A3CR2 chief resident survey.

      Materials and Methods

      An online survey was distributed to chief residents from 197 Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education–accredited radiology residency programs. Chief residents responded to questions regarding their individual procedural readiness and attitudes on virtual radiology education. A single chief resident from each residency answered programmatic questions including the use of virtual education, faculty coverage, and fellowship choices among their graduating classes.

      Results

      We received 110 individual responses from 61 programs, yielding a 31% program response rate. Although the majority (80%) of programs maintained purely in-person attending readout throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, only 13% of programs reported purely in-person didactics and 26% converted to all virtual didactics. The majority (53%-74%) of chief residents perceived virtual learning (in read-out, case conference, and didactic formats) to be less effective than in-person learning. One third of chief residents reported decreased procedural exposure during the pandemic, and 7%-9% of chief residents felt uncomfortable with basic procedures (basic fluoroscopy examinations, basic aspiration/drainage procedures, and superficial biopsy procedures). The number of programs with 24/7 attending coverage increased from 35% in 2019 to 49% in 2022. Body, neuroradiology, and interventional radiology were the most popular advanced training options among graduating radiology residents.

      Conclusion

      The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on radiology training, particularly in terms of virtual learning. These survey results suggest that although digital learning offers increased flexibility, most residents still prefer in-person readout and didactics. Despite this, virtual learning will likely remain a viable option as programs continue to evolve following the pandemic.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. Robinson JD, Keller CE, Larson PA, et al. What's in a Name? Report of the ACR Task Force on General Radiology and Multi-Subspecialization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022;19(3):488-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.10.011. Epub 2022 Jan 31. PMID: 35094941.

      2. Hoegger MJ, Shetty AS, Denner DR, et al. A Snapshot of Radiology Training During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):607-613. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 29. PMID: 32690337; PMCID: PMC7322484.

      3. Matalon SA, Souza DAT, Gaviola GC, Silverman SG, Mayo-Smith WW, Lee LK. Trainee and Attending Perspectives on Remote Radiology Readouts in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Radiol. 2020 Aug;27(8):1147-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 May 23. PMID: 32507612; PMCID: PMC7245278.

      4. Awan OA. Virtual Radiology Readouts After the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):765-766. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25607. Epub 2021 Feb 17. PMID: 33594906.

        • Poyiadji N.
        • Klochko C.
        • Laforce J.
        • et al.
        Education COVID-19 and radiology resident imaging volumes-differential impact by resident training year and imaging modality.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 106-111
      5. Recht MP, Fefferman NR, Bittman ME, et al.. Preserving Radiology Resident Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Simulated Daily Readout. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(8):1154-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 Jun 8. PMID: 32553278; PMCID: PMC7833746.

      6. Lanier MH, Wheeler CA, Ballard DH. A New Normal in Radiology Resident Education: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Radiographics. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):E71-E72. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210030. PMID: 33939548; PMCID: PMC8103952.

        • Chen D.
        • Ayoob A.
        • Desser T.S.
        • Khurana A.
        Review of learning tools for effective radiology education during the COVID-19 era.
        Acad Radiol. 2022; 29: 129-136
        • Alhasan A.S.
        • Alahmadi S.M.
        • Altayeb Y.A
        • et al.
        Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on training and well-being in radiology residency: a national survey of diagnostic radiology trainees in Saudi Arabia.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1002-1009
      7. Shail MS. Using Micro-learning on Mobile Applications to Increase Knowledge Retention and Work Performance: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2019 Aug 2;11(8):e5307. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5307. PMID: 31511813; PMCID: PMC6716752.

      8. Perchik JD, Smith AD, Elkassem AA, et al. Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Developing a Multi-institutional Infrastructure for AI Education. Acad Radiol. 2022;30:S1076-6332(22)00516-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.002. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36323613.

      9. Gabr AM, Li N, Schenning RC, et al. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Case Volume and Education in the Age of Pandemics: Impact Analysis and Potential Future Directions. Acad Radiol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1481-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 21. PMID: 32703647; PMCID: PMC7372272.

      10. Grayev A, Catanzano TM, Sarkany D, el al. ACGME Diagnostic Radiology Milestones 2.0: the Time is Now. Acad Radiol. 2022;29 Suppl 5:S18-S26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 5. PMID: 33293257.

      11. Dako F, Awan OA. The Radiology Readout: How Much Does It Matter? Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2021 Jan-Feb;41(1):316-317. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200023. PMID: 33411612.

        • Dunning D.
        The dunning–kruger effect: on being ignorant of one's own ignorance.
        Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2011; 44: 247-296
      12. Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE, Aben GR, Potchen MJ, Potter MG, Siebert JE. Measuring performance in chest radiography. Radiology. 2000;217(2):456-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv14456. PMID: 11058645.