Rationale and Objectives
Endovascular simulation is a validated training method, allowing residents to improve
technical skills with interventional equipment in a risk-free environment. The purpose
of this study was to assess the utility and efficacy of supplementing the IR/DR Integrated
Residency training program with a dedicated 2-year endovascular simulation curriculum.
Materials and Methods
Trainees participated in a 2-year curriculum that included the completion of 8 modules
using a high-fidelity endovascular simulator (Mentice AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). Procedural
modules included IVC filter placement, transarterial chemoembolization, trauma embolization,
uterine artery embolization, prostate artery embolization, and peripheral arterial
disease interventions. Each quarter, two trainees were filmed while completing an
assigned module. Sessions led by IR faculty were held with film footage review and
didactics on the assigned topic. Pre- and postcase surveys were collected to evaluate
trainee comfort and confidence and assess the validity of the simulation. At the conclusion
of the 2-year period, a postcurriculum survey was sent to all trainees to determine
how residents viewed the utility of the simulation sessions.
Results
Eight residents participated in the pre- and postcase surveys. The simulation curriculum
significantly increased trainee confidence for these 8 residents. A separate postcurriculum
survey was completed by all 16 IR/DR residents. All 16 residents felt that simulation
was a helpful addition to their education. A total of 87.5% of all residents felt
that the sessions improved their confidence in the IR procedure room. A total of 75%
of all residents believe that the simulation curriculum should be incorporated into
the IR residency program.
Conclusion
Adoption of a 2-year simulation curriculum can be considered for existing IR/DR training
programs with access to high-fidelity endovascular simulators using the described
approach.
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Developing and evaluating a simulator for complex IVC filter retrieval.Acad Radiol. 2020; 27: 885-888https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.08.008
- High-fidelity endovascular simulation.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 22: 7-13https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2018.10.003
- Simulation-based training for interventional radiology and opportunities for improving the educational paradigm.Tech Vasc Int Radiol. 2019; 22: 35-40https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2018.10.008
- A proficiency based stepwise endovascular curricular training (PROSPECT) program enhances operative performance in real life: a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 54: 387-396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.011
- General surgery education: a systematic review of training worldwide.Lancet. 2015; 385: S39https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60834-0
- Evidence for endovascular simulation training: a systematic review.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016; 51: 441-451https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.10.011
- Simulation devices in interventional radiology: validation pending.J Vasc Int Radiol. 2006; 17: 215-216https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000197480.16245.1A
- Simulation and the coming transformation of medical education and training.Radiology. 2007; 245: 7-9https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451070674
- Procedural simulation's developing role in medicine.Lancet. 2007; 369: 1671-1673https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60760-0
- Endovascular simulation as a supplemental training tool during the COVID-19 national emergency.Clin Imaging. 2020; 67: 72-73https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.05.026
- Using simulation for interventional radiology training.Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 546-553https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/33259594
- Virtual reality triage training can provide comparable simulation efficacy for paramedicine students compared to live simulation-based scenarios.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020; 24: 525-536https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2019.1676345
- Endovascular training using a simulation based curriculum is less expensive than training in the hybrid angiosuite.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018; 56: 583-590https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.011
- Filling a void: developing a standard subjective assessment tool for surgical simulation through focused review of current practices.Surgery. 2014; 156: 718-722https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.048
- Simulation based teaching in interventional radiology training: is it effective?.Clin Radiol. 2017; 72 (266.e7-266.e14)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.014
- Utilizing high-fidelity simulators in improving trainee confidence and competency in code management.Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021; 6: e496https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000496
- The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2021; 44: 843-854https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01314-2
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 25, 2023
Accepted:
January 27,
2023
Received in revised form:
January 25,
2023
Received:
August 19,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
