Advertisement
Original Investigation Original Investigation|Articles in Press

Comparison of Axillary Lymph Nodes on Breast MRI Before and After COVID-19 Booster Vaccination

Published:March 15, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.012

      ABSTRACT

      Rationale and Objectives

      Vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is a frequent finding following initial COVID-19 vaccination, but the frequency after COVID-19 booster vaccination is still unknown. In this study we compare axillary lymph node morphology on breast MRI before and after COVID-19 booster vaccination.

      Material and Methods

      This retrospective, single-center, IRB-approved study included patients who underwent breast MRI between October 2021 and December 2021 after the COVID-19 booster vaccination. The axillary lymph node with the greatest cortical thickness ipsilateral to the side of vaccination was measured on MRI after booster vaccination and before initial COVID-19 vaccination. Comparisons were made between patients with and without increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm. Continuous covariates were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical covariates were compared using Fisher's exact test. Multiple comparison adjustment was made using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

      Results

      128 patients were included. 24/128 (19%) displayed an increase in lymph node cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm. Patients who received the booster more recently were more likely to present cortical thickening, with a median of 9 days (IQR 5, 20) vs. 36 days (IQR 18, 59) (p < 0.001). Age (p = 0.5) and type of vaccine (p = 0.7) were not associated with thickening. No ipsilateral breast cancer or malignant lymphadenopathy were diagnosed on follow-up.

      Conclusion

      Axillary lymphadenopathy on breast MRI following COVID-19 booster vaccination is a frequent finding, especially in the first 3 weeks after vaccination. Additional evaluation or follow-up may be omitted in patients with low concern for malignancy.

      KEYWORDS

      ABBREVIATIONS:

      FDA (Food and Drug Administration), IQR (Interquartile Range), WHO (World Health Organization)

      INTRODUCTION

      The first cases of SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged in December of 2019. Rapid spread of the virus led the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a pandemic in March of 2020 (
      • Domingo P
      • Mur I
      • Pomar V
      • Corominas H
      • Casademont J
      • de Benito N.
      The four horsemen of a viral Apocalypse: The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19).
      ). The COVID-19 pandemic sparked a worldwide effort to reduce the rate of transmission. Countries went into lockdown while numerous efforts began to develop effective vaccines against the virus (
      • Shah SGS
      • Nogueras D
      • van Woerden HC
      • Kiparoglou V.
      The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pandemic of Lockdown Loneliness and the Role of Digital Technology.
      ,
      • Bok K
      • Sitar S
      • Graham BS
      • Mascola JR.
      Accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons, and prospects.
      ).
      The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first granted emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (BNT162b2) followed by the Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273) in December of 2020 (,). As the pandemic progressed, the emergence of new COVID-19 variants and the potential waning of antibodies pushed for the rollout of additional doses and booster vaccinations (
      • Chenchula S
      • Karunakaran P
      • Sharma S
      • Chavan M.
      Current evidence on efficacy of COVID-19 booster dose vaccination against the Omicron variant: A systematic review.
      ,
      • Thompson MG
      • Natarajan K
      • Irving SA
      • Rowley EA
      • Griggs EP
      • Gaglani M
      • Klein NP
      • Grannis SJ
      • DeSilva MB
      • Stenehjem E
      • Reese SE
      • Dickerson M
      • Naleway AL
      • Han J
      • Konatham D
      • McEvoy C
      • Rao S
      • Dixon BE
      • Dascomb K
      • Lewis N
      • Levy ME
      • Patel P
      • Liao IC
      • Kharbanda AB
      • Barron MA
      • Fadel WF
      • Grisel N
      • Goddard K
      • Yang DH
      • Wondimu MH
      • Murthy K
      • Valvi NR
      • Arndorfer J
      • Fireman B
      • Dunne MM
      • Embi P
      • Azziz-Baumgartner E
      • Zerbo O
      • Bozio CH
      • Reynolds S
      • Ferdinands J
      • Williams J
      • Link-Gelles R
      • Schrag SJ
      • Verani JR
      • Ball S
      • Ong TC
      Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022.
      ,
      • Andrews N
      • Stowe J
      • Kirsebom F
      • Toffa S
      • Rickeard T
      • Gallagher E
      • Gower C
      • Kall M
      • Groves N
      • O'Connell AM
      • Simons D
      • Blomquist PB
      • Zaidi A
      • Nash S
      • Iwani Binti Abdul Aziz N
      • Thelwall S
      • Dabrera G
      • Myers R
      • Amirthalingam G
      • Gharbia S
      • Barrett JC
      • Elson R
      • Ladhani SN
      • Ferguson N
      • Zambon M
      • Campbell CNJ
      • Brown K
      • Hopkins S
      • Chand M
      • Ramsay M
      • Lopez Bernal J.
      Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.
      ,
      • Barda N
      • Dagan N
      • Cohen C
      • Hernán MA
      • Lipsitch M
      • Kohane IS
      • Reis BY
      • Balicer RD.
      Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study.
      ). In September of 2021, the first booster dose became available for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and approval of the Moderna booster vaccine followed in October of 2021. In March of 2022, a second Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose became available for adults over the age of 50 and immunocompromised individuals above the age of 12; a second Moderna booster next became available for immunocompromised individuals above the age of 18 (
      Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Second Booster Dose of Two COVID-19 Vaccines for Older and Immunocompromised Individuals.
      ,
      Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Takes Additional Actions on the Use of a Booster Dose for COVID-19 Vaccines.
      , ).
      Lymphadenopathy can be associated with benign conditions, such as infections, mastitis, and abscesses. Malignant infiltration of the axillary lymph nodes is most commonly seen in breast cancer but can also be seen in several other cancer types (
      • Schiaffino S
      • Pinker K
      • Magni V
      • Cozzi A
      • Athanasiou A
      • Baltzer PAT
      • Camps Herrero J
      • Clauser P
      • Fallenberg EM
      • Forrai G
      • Fuchsjäger MH
      • Helbich TH
      • Kilburn-Toppin F
      • Kuhl CK
      • Lesaru M
      • Mann RM
      • Panizza P
      • Pediconi F
      • Pijnappel RM
      • Sella T
      • Thomassin-Naggara I
      • Zackrisson S
      • Gilbert FJ
      • Sardanelli F
      Axillary lymphadenopathy at the time of COVID-19 vaccination: ten recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
      ,
      • Park SH
      • Jeong YM
      • Cho SH
      • Jung HK
      • Kim SJ
      • Ryu HS.
      Imaging findings of variable axillary mass and axillary lymphadenopathy.
      ). Lymphadenopathy can also represent lymphoma (
      • Xu G
      • Lu Y.
      COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination-Induced Lymphadenopathy Mimics Lymphoma Progression on FDG PET/CT.
      ). Ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination, shown in patients using both physical examination and imaging modalities (
      • Baden LR
      • El Sahly HM
      • Essink B
      • Kotloff K
      • Frey S
      • Novak R
      • Diemert D
      • Spector SA
      • Rouphael N
      • Creech CB
      • McGettigan J
      • Khetan S
      • Segall N
      • Solis J
      • Brosz A
      • Fierro C
      • Schwartz H
      • Neuzil K
      • Corey L
      • Gilbert P
      • Janes H
      • Follmann D
      • Marovich M
      • Mascola J
      • Polakowski L
      • Ledgerwood J
      • Graham BS
      • Bennett H
      • Pajon R
      • Knightly C
      • Leav B
      • Deng W
      • Zhou H
      • Han S
      • Ivarsson M
      • Miller J
      • Zaks T
      • Group CS
      Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.
      ,
      • Polack FP
      • Thomas SJ
      • Kitchin N
      • Absalon J
      • Gurtman A
      • Lockhart S
      • Perez JL
      • G Pérez Marc
      • Moreira ED
      • Zerbini C
      • Bailey R
      • Swanson KA
      • Roychoudhury S
      • Koury K
      • Li P
      • Kalina WV
      • Cooper D
      • Frenck RW
      • Hammitt LL
      • Ö Türeci
      • Nell H
      • Schaefer A
      • Ünal S
      • Tresnan DB
      • Mather S
      • Dormitzer PR
      • Şahin U
      • Jansen KU
      • Gruber WC
      • Group CCT
      Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.
      ,
      • Mehta N
      • Sales RM
      • Babagbemi K
      • Levy AD
      • McGrath AL
      • Drotman M
      • Dodelzon K.
      Unilateral axillary Adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccine.
      ,
      • Keshavarz P
      • Yazdanpanah F
      • Rafiee F
      • Mizandari M.
      Lymphadenopathy Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Imaging Findings Review.
      ,
      • Faermann R
      • Nissan N
      • Halshtok-Neiman O
      • Shalmon A
      • Gotlieb M
      • Yagil Y
      • Samoocha D
      • Friedman E
      • Sklair-Levy M.
      COVID-19 Vaccination Induced Lymphadenopathy in a Specialized Breast Imaging Clinic in Israel: Analysis of 163 cases.
      ), poses a diagnostic concern for physicians evaluating patients for new, current, or recurring breast cancer (
      • Özütemiz C
      • Krystosek LA
      • Church AL
      • Chauhan A
      • Ellermann JM
      • Domingo-Musibay E
      • Steinberger D.
      Lymphadenopathy in COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients: Diagnostic Dilemma in Oncology Patients.
      ,
      • Nguyen DL
      • Ambinder EB
      • Myers KS
      • Mullen LA
      • Panigrahi B
      • Oluyemi E.
      COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Axillary Adenopathy on Breast Imaging: Follow-Up Recommendations and Histopathologic Findings.
      ).
      As more studies reveal the frequency of lymphadenopathy following initial COVID-19 vaccination, much about this association remains unknown. There is a lack of information available in the literature regarding the frequency and appropriate management of lymphadenopathy in patients after the COVID-19 booster vaccination. In this study, we compared axillary lymph node morphology based on change in cortical thickness on breast MRI before and after COVID-19 booster vaccination and report the outcomes of patients with vaccine-related lymphadenopathy.

      MATERIAL AND METHODS

      Population

      We conducted a retrospective single-center study approved by the Institutional Review Board and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability Act and Accountability Act. Patients who underwent breast MRI at our tertiary care cancer center following COVID-19 booster vaccination between October 2021 and December 2021 were identified. The Institutional Review Board waived the necessity to obtain patient-informed consent. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (
      • Domingo P
      • Mur I
      • Pomar V
      • Corominas H
      • Casademont J
      • de Benito N.
      The four horsemen of a viral Apocalypse: The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19).
      ) missing information regarding COVID-19 booster vaccination (date, site of vaccination administration, vaccine type), (
      • Shah SGS
      • Nogueras D
      • van Woerden HC
      • Kiparoglou V.
      The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pandemic of Lockdown Loneliness and the Role of Digital Technology.
      ) history of treated ipsilateral breast cancer, (
      • Bok K
      • Sitar S
      • Graham BS
      • Mascola JR.
      Accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons, and prospects.
      ) current breast cancer, () no prior MRI before initial COVID-19 vaccination within 5 years for comparison, () no visible axillary lymph nodes on either current or prior MRI. The final study sample was 128 patients. A flowchart of patient inclusion is demonstrated in Fig. 1.
      Figure 1
      Figure 1– Flowchart demonstrating patient inclusion.

      MRI protocol

      Breast MRIs were performed on a 1.5T or 3.0T equipment with a dedicated breast coil with 8 or 16 channels. The protocol included axial T1 non-fat sat, T2 fat sat, T2 non-fat sat and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences with 3 or more contrast-enhanced phases depending on the protocol utilized at the period. Post-contrast sequences were obtained after the intravenous injection of gadobutrol at 0.1 mL/kg followed by a 20 mL saline flush.

      Imaging analysis

      The axillary lymph nodes ipsilateral to the side of COVID-19 booster vaccination were evaluated on current and prior breast MRIs. In patients that had more than 1 prior breast MRI, the most recent MRI prior to first COVID-19 vaccination was utilized. The lymph node with greatest cortical thickness on the breast MRI after COVID-19 booster vaccination was identified on contrast-enhanced sequence. Measurements of cortical thickness and short and long axes were obtained from the lymph node by a breast radiologist with 10 years of experience in breast imaging. The same lymph node was then identified on prior MRI and measured in the same fashion.

      Statistical analysis

      The results were expressed in medians, ranges and proportions. Interquartile ranges (IQR) were provided. The measurements of cortical thickness and long and short axes of lymph nodes before and after COVID-19 vaccination were compared. Subjects were separated in groups according to increase in cortical thickness of < 0.2 cm or ≥ 0.2 cm. Patient age, type of vaccine, and days between booster vaccination and breast MRI were compared between patients with and without cortical thickening. Continuous covariates were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical covariates were compared using Fisher's exact test. Multiple comparison adjustment was made using the Benjamini–Hochberg (false discovery rate) procedure. The adjusted type I error rate was set to 0.05 (α). For sample size calculation, we initially assumed that the prevalence of lymphadenopathy in this subpopulation would be 5% and powered our study to detect this estimate with a one-sided precision of 5% and obtained a total sample size requirement of 107.

      RESULTS

      Study sample

      All 128 patients who underwent a breast MRI after receiving a COVID-19 booster vaccination were female (100%). 119/128 (93%) patients had a screening breast MRI while 9/128 (7%) had a diagnostic breast MRI, all to follow-up a probably benign finding. The median age of these patients was 56 years (IQR 47, 64). The Moderna booster vaccine was administered in 38/128 (30%) patients. The Pfizer-BioNTec booster vaccine was administered in 90/128 (70%) patients. The median number of days between the MRI and administration of the booster vaccine was 31 (IQR 15, 57). On MRI prior to initial COVID-19 vaccination, the median value for lymph node cortical thickness was 0.3 cm (IQR 0.2, 0.4), the median long axis was 1.2 cm (IQR 0.9, 1.6), and the median short axis was 0.6 cm (IQR 0.5, 0.8). On MRI after booster vaccination, the median value for lymph node cortical thickness was 0.3 cm (IQR 0.2, 0.5), the median long axis was 1.3 cm (IQR 1.0, 1.7), and the median short axis was 0.7 cm (IQR 0.5, 0.9). Patient information is summarized in Table 1.
      Table 1- Patient characteristics
      Characteristics of patientsn%
      Total number of participants (100% women)128100
      Patient median age = 56 years (IQR, 47–64)
      Median days since booster = 31 days (IQR, 15–57)
      Indication for breast MRI
      Screening11993
      Diagnostic97
      Personal history of breast cancer
      Yes4535
      No8365
      Family history of breast cancer3830
      Yes10380
      No2520
      Type of booster vaccination
      Pfizer BioNTech9070
      Moderna3830
      Arm side of vaccine
      Right3427
      Left9473
      Abbreviations: IQR = interquartile range

      Change in morphology of axillary lymph nodes

      There were 24/128 (19%) patients who had an increase in lymph node cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm from MRI prior to the initial COVID-19 vaccination. The number of days between MRI and administration of the booster vaccine was significantly associated with an increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm (p < 0.001). The median number of days between MRI and booster vaccine in patients with an increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm was 9 days (IQR 5, 20) as compared to 36 days (IQR 18, 59) in patients with an increase in cortical thickness of < 0.2 cm. Thickening of ≥ 0.2 cm occurred from 3 to 113 days after the booster. Statistically significant increases in both long and short axes were observed in patients with an increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm (p < 0.001 for both). Median increases in long and short axes were 0.4 cm (IQR 0.1, 0.4) and 0.2 cm (IQR 0.2, 0.3) for patients with an increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm compared to 0.1 cm (IQR 0, 0.2) and 0 cm (IQR 0, 0.1) for patients with an increase in cortical thickness of < 0.2 cm. Increases in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm were not statistically significantly associated with age (p = 0.5) or type of booster vaccine (p = 0.7). A summary of the results is demonstrated in Table 2.
      Table 2– Comparisons between patients with and without cortical thickening utilizing a cutoff of ≥ 0.2 cm.
      Cortical Thickness Increase ≥ 0.2 cm
      < 0.2 cm (n=104)≥ 0.2 cm

      (n=24)
      p valueq-value
      Age (median, IQR)56 (47, 64)53 (46, 61)0.50.6
      Pfizer BioNTech74 (71%)16 (67%)0.70.7
      Moderna30 (29%)8 (33%)
      Days from booster (median, IQR)36 (18, 59)9 (5, 20)<0.001<0.001
      Increase in long axis

      (cm, median, IQR)
      0.1 (0, 0.2)0.4 (0.1, 0.4)<0.001<0.001
      Increase in short axis

      (cm, median, IQR)
      0 (0, 0.1)0.2 (0.2, 0.3)<0.001<0.001
      Abbreviations: IQR = interquartile range

      Follow-up

      All patients with cortical thickening of ≥ 0.2 cm had imaging follow-up except for 1/24 (4%). A following breast MRI or axillary ultrasound at different time points was available for 18/24 (75%) patients while only a mammogram 5–12 months after the post-vaccination breast MRI was available for 5/24 (21%). No ipsilateral breast cancer or axillary malignancy was detected as of December 31st, 2022. One patient presented contralateral breast cancer on follow-up with negative lymph nodes on sentinel lymph node biopsy. A case example of axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 booster vaccination that resolved on follow-up is demonstrated in Fig 2.
      Figure 2
      Figure 2– 57-year-old woman with normal-appearing left axillary lymph node on Breast MRI before initial COVID-19 vaccination (a, arrow). Breast MRI performed 3 days after the booster vaccination in the left arm demonstrates an enlarged lymph node lacking a fatty hilum (b). Breast MRI performed 1 year after the booster demonstrates that the lymph node has returned to its normal morphology.

      DISCUSSION

      The frequency of increase in lymph node cortical thickness on breast MRI following COVID-19 booster vaccination was 19%. An increase in long and short axes was also observed in patients with cortical thickening. The number of days following booster vaccination was associated with cortical thickening; patients who received the booster vaccination more recently were more likely to have lymph nodes with increased cortical thickness.
      The detection of lymphadenopathy on imaging is a challenging task for the radiologist. Several features have been described to be associated with lymphadenopathy on breast MRI, including lack of a fatty hilum, decreased long/short axis ratio, irregular contours, heterogeneity, and asymmetry when compared to the contralateral axilla (
      • Horvat JV
      • Morris EA
      • Bernard-Davila B
      • Martinez DF
      • Leithner D
      • Ochoa-Albiztegui RE
      • Thakur SB
      Pinker K. MRI evaluation of axillary and intramammary lymph nodes in the postoperative period.
      ). Cortical thickness is the morphological feature most commonly used to detect malignant lymphadenopathy, with previous publications demonstrating moderate accuracy in patients with breast cancer when utilizing a cutoff of 0.3 cm (
      • Luciani A
      • Pigneur F
      • Ghozali F
      • Dao TH
      • Cunin P
      • Meyblum E
      • De Baecque-Fontaine C
      • Alamdari A
      • Maison P
      • Deux JF
      • Lagrange JL
      • Lantieri L
      • Rahmouni A.
      Ex vivo MRI of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
      ,
      • Korteweg MA
      • Zwanenburg JJ
      • Hoogduin JM
      • van den Bosch MA
      • van Diest PJ
      • van Hillegersberg R
      • Eijkemans MJ
      • Mali WP
      • Luijten PR
      • Veldhuis WB.
      Dissected sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients: characterization with high-spatial-resolution 7-T MR imaging.
      ). In spite of that, the identification of an abnormal lymph node can be subjective. The detection of lymphadenopathy may be facilitated when a prior MRI is available for comparison. A change in morphology, including an increase in cortical thickness is indicative of lymphadenopathy. Although there is not a specific cutoff for increase in cortical thickness to classify a lymph node as abnormal, for the purpose of our study we chose a cutoff of ≥ 0.2 cm of increase in thickness.
      The frequency of ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy after initial COVID-19 vaccination has been frequently reported, but with highly variable rates. Initial reports found the presence of clinically evident lymphadenopathy in 0.3% of patients following Pfizer-BioNTec COVID-19 vaccination and up to 16% of patients following Moderna COVID-19 vaccination on physical examination (
      Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
      ,
      Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
      ). In a previous publication, lymphadenopathy on breast MRI following initial COVID-19 vaccination was demonstrated to occur in 29% of patients (
      • Horvat JV
      • Sevilimedu V
      • Becker AS
      • Perez-Johnston R
      • Yeh R
      • Feigin KN.
      Frequency and outcomes of MRI-detected axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination.
      ). Other studies demonstrated even higher frequencies. Wolfson et al. (
      • Wolfson S
      • Kim E
      • Plaunova A
      • Bukhman R
      • Sarmiento RD
      • Samreen N
      • Awal D
      • Sheth MM
      • Toth HB
      • Moy L
      • Reig B.
      Axillary Adenopathy after COVID-19 Vaccine: No Reason to Delay Screening Mammogram.
      ) found lymphadenopathy in 44% of patients using a combination of mammography and breast ultrasound and Antwi et al. (
      • Antwi K
      • Caobelli F
      • Kudura K
      • Buchholz HG
      • Hoffmann M
      • Schreckenberger M.
      Hypermetabolic Ipsilateral Supraclavicular and Axillary Lymphadenopathy: Optimal Time Point for Performing an.
      ) found lymphadenopathy in 37% of patients who underwent PET/CT following COVID-19 vaccination. Our study showed a lower but still considerable frequency of lymphadenopathy in patients after the booster vaccination. Therefore, information regarding recent COVID-19 booster vaccination is necessary for adequate imaging interpretation and management of patients with lymphadenopathy.
      The presence of lymphadenopathy was more likely when less time had passed since the most recent COVID-19 booster vaccination, in agreement with previous findings on initial COVID-19 vaccination (
      • Horvat JV
      • Sevilimedu V
      • Becker AS
      • Perez-Johnston R
      • Yeh R
      • Feigin KN.
      Frequency and outcomes of MRI-detected axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination.
      ,
      • Maimone S
      • Robinson KA
      • Advani PP
      • Li Z
      • Gococo-Benore DA
      • Qosja N
      • Ashai AM
      • Mummareddy A
      • Chumsri S.
      Limiting Screening Mammography Recalls for Vaccine-Induced Adenopathy, a Single Institution Experience.
      ,
      • Raj S
      • Ogola G
      • Han J.
      COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Subclinical Axillary Lymphadenopathy on Screening Mammogram.
      ). Our study found that the number of days following booster vaccination was statistically significant in the case of a cortical thickness increase of ≥ 0.2 cm, with a median of 9 days (IQR 5, 20) after the vaccine dose. Most patients presented lymphadenopathy in the first 3 weeks after the vaccine dose.
      In the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination program, many authors recommended imaging follow-up for patients with lymphadenopathy in order to avoid misdiagnosis of metastatic adenopathy or lymphoma (
      • Becker AS
      • Perez-Johnston R
      • Chikarmane SA
      • Chen MM
      • El Homsi M
      • Feigin KN
      • Gallagher KM
      • Hanna EY
      • Hicks M
      • Ilica AT
      • Mayer EL
      • Shinagare AB
      • Yeh R
      • Mayerhoefer ME
      • Hricak H
      • Vargas HA.
      Multidisciplinary Recommendations Regarding Post-Vaccine Adenopathy and Radiologic Imaging.
      ,
      • Seely JM
      • Barry MH.
      The Canadian Society of Breast Imaging/Canadian Association of Radiologists' Recommendations for the Management of Axillary Adenopathy in Patients With Recent COVID-19 Vaccination.
      ,
      • Grimm L
      • Srini A
      • Dontchos B
      • Daly C
      • Tuite C
      • Sonnenblick E
      • Milch H
      • Net J
      • Dodelzon K
      • Yang R
      • Goudreau S
      • Jacobs S
      • Dialani V
      • Kacharia V.
      ,
      • Mortazavi S.
      Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccination Associated Axillary Adenopathy: Imaging Findings and Follow-Up Recommendations in 23 Women.
      ,
      • Duke H
      • Posch L
      • Green L.
      Axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination: A single institution case series.
      ). As more information was gathered in the literature, the perceived need for imaging follow-up diminished. Given the high frequency of lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination, further evaluation or follow-up may not be necessary in patients without a suspicious finding within the breast (
      • Schiaffino S
      • Pinker K
      • Magni V
      • Cozzi A
      • Athanasiou A
      • Baltzer PAT
      • Camps Herrero J
      • Clauser P
      • Fallenberg EM
      • Forrai G
      • Fuchsjäger MH
      • Helbich TH
      • Kilburn-Toppin F
      • Kuhl CK
      • Lesaru M
      • Mann RM
      • Panizza P
      • Pediconi F
      • Pijnappel RM
      • Sella T
      • Thomassin-Naggara I
      • Zackrisson S
      • Gilbert FJ
      • Sardanelli F
      Axillary lymphadenopathy at the time of COVID-19 vaccination: ten recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
      ). Follow-up, fine needle aspiration or core needle biopsy may be considered in cases with persistent lymphadenopathy several weeks after the vaccination (
      • Nguyen DL
      • Ambinder EB
      • Myers KS
      • Mullen LA
      • Panigrahi B
      • Oluyemi E.
      COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Axillary Adenopathy on Breast Imaging: Follow-Up Recommendations and Histopathologic Findings.
      ). A similar strategy should be considered for patients following the COVID-19 booster vaccination, as the frequency of lymphadenopathy can be considered high, especially during the first 3 weeks after the booster.
      Previous publications have demonstrated features that can be used to differentiate vaccine-related from malignant lymphadenopathy (
      • Hl C
      • Gj W
      • Jwt L
      • J S
      • Lp M
      • Ht LP
      Ultrasound Features to Differentiate COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Benign Adenopathy from Breast Cancer Related Malignant Adenopathy.
      ,
      • van Nijnatten TJA
      • Jochelson MS
      • Lobbes MBI.
      Axillary lymph node characteristics in breast cancer patients versus post-COVID-19 vaccination: Overview of current evidence per imaging modality.
      ). Unfortunately, these features may overlap. In patients with abnormal lymph nodes and known ipsilateral breast malignancy, lymphadenopathy should not be assumed to represent vaccine-related changes.
      Although axillary lymphadenopathy is known to occur after COVID-19 vaccination, delaying breast exams is currently not encouraged (
      • Wolfson S
      • Kim E
      • Plaunova A
      • Bukhman R
      • Sarmiento RD
      • Samreen N
      • Awal D
      • Sheth MM
      • Toth HB
      • Moy L
      • Reig B.
      Axillary Adenopathy after COVID-19 Vaccine: No Reason to Delay Screening Mammogram.
      ,
      • Grimm L
      • Srini A
      • Dontchos B
      • Daly C
      • Tuite C
      • Sonnenblick E
      • Milch H
      • Net J
      • Dodelzon K
      • Yang R
      • Goudreau S
      • Jacobs S
      • Dialani V
      • Kacharia V.
      ). Delaying breast imaging studies may decrease breast cancer screening compliance with a potential negative impact on morbidity and mortality.
      There were several limitations to this study. First, this was a retrospective study with patients undergoing breast MRI at different time points after the COVID-19 booster vaccination. Second, not all patients had follow-up and, for those who did, follow-up times were inconsistent. Third, all MRI measurements were made by only a single radiologist.

      CONCLUSIONS

      In conclusion, ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy on breast MRI following COVID-19 booster vaccination is a frequent finding, observed in 19% of patients. Vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy is associated with shorter time between the COVID-19 booster and MRI, often detected in the first 3 weeks after the vaccine dose. Given the high frequency of lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 booster vaccination, additional evaluation or follow-up may be omitted in patients with low concern for malignancy.

      Disclosures

      Disclosures: Kimberly N Feigin is a clinical advisor for Covera Health, Inc. and consultant for FujiFilm. Katja Pinker is a consultant for Genentech, Inc., Merantix Healthcare, and AURA Health Technologies GmbH.

      Acknowledgements

      The authors thank Garon Scott, BA for providing assistance in editing this manuscript
      Funding information: Memorial Sloan Kettering has received funding by the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748

      REFERENCES

        • Domingo P
        • Mur I
        • Pomar V
        • Corominas H
        • Casademont J
        • de Benito N.
        The four horsemen of a viral Apocalypse: The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19).
        EBioMedicine. 2020; 58102887https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102887
        • Shah SGS
        • Nogueras D
        • van Woerden HC
        • Kiparoglou V.
        The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pandemic of Lockdown Loneliness and the Role of Digital Technology.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22: e22287https://doi.org/10.2196/22287
        • Bok K
        • Sitar S
        • Graham BS
        • Mascola JR.
        Accelerated COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons, and prospects.
        Immunity. 2021; 54: 1636-1651https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.017
      1. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
        United States Food and Drug Administration, 2023 (January 09)
      2. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.
        United States Food and Drug Administration, 2023 (January 09)
        • Chenchula S
        • Karunakaran P
        • Sharma S
        • Chavan M.
        Current evidence on efficacy of COVID-19 booster dose vaccination against the Omicron variant: A systematic review.
        J Med Virol. 2022; 94: 2969-2976https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27697
        • Thompson MG
        • Natarajan K
        • Irving SA
        • Rowley EA
        • Griggs EP
        • Gaglani M
        • Klein NP
        • Grannis SJ
        • DeSilva MB
        • Stenehjem E
        • Reese SE
        • Dickerson M
        • Naleway AL
        • Han J
        • Konatham D
        • McEvoy C
        • Rao S
        • Dixon BE
        • Dascomb K
        • Lewis N
        • Levy ME
        • Patel P
        • Liao IC
        • Kharbanda AB
        • Barron MA
        • Fadel WF
        • Grisel N
        • Goddard K
        • Yang DH
        • Wondimu MH
        • Murthy K
        • Valvi NR
        • Arndorfer J
        • Fireman B
        • Dunne MM
        • Embi P
        • Azziz-Baumgartner E
        • Zerbo O
        • Bozio CH
        • Reynolds S
        • Ferdinands J
        • Williams J
        • Link-Gelles R
        • Schrag SJ
        • Verani JR
        • Ball S
        • Ong TC
        Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71: 139-145https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e3
        • Andrews N
        • Stowe J
        • Kirsebom F
        • Toffa S
        • Rickeard T
        • Gallagher E
        • Gower C
        • Kall M
        • Groves N
        • O'Connell AM
        • Simons D
        • Blomquist PB
        • Zaidi A
        • Nash S
        • Iwani Binti Abdul Aziz N
        • Thelwall S
        • Dabrera G
        • Myers R
        • Amirthalingam G
        • Gharbia S
        • Barrett JC
        • Elson R
        • Ladhani SN
        • Ferguson N
        • Zambon M
        • Campbell CNJ
        • Brown K
        • Hopkins S
        • Chand M
        • Ramsay M
        • Lopez Bernal J.
        Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.
        N Engl J Med. 2022; 386: 1532-1546https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451
        • Barda N
        • Dagan N
        • Cohen C
        • Hernán MA
        • Lipsitch M
        • Kohane IS
        • Reis BY
        • Balicer RD.
        Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study.
        Lancet. 2021; 398: 2093-2100https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2
      3. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Second Booster Dose of Two COVID-19 Vaccines for Older and Immunocompromised Individuals.
        2023 (January 09)
      4. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Takes Additional Actions on the Use of a Booster Dose for COVID-19 Vaccines.
        2023 (January 09)
      5. FDA Authorizes Booster Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Certain Populations.
        2023 (January 09)
        • Schiaffino S
        • Pinker K
        • Magni V
        • Cozzi A
        • Athanasiou A
        • Baltzer PAT
        • Camps Herrero J
        • Clauser P
        • Fallenberg EM
        • Forrai G
        • Fuchsjäger MH
        • Helbich TH
        • Kilburn-Toppin F
        • Kuhl CK
        • Lesaru M
        • Mann RM
        • Panizza P
        • Pediconi F
        • Pijnappel RM
        • Sella T
        • Thomassin-Naggara I
        • Zackrisson S
        • Gilbert FJ
        • Sardanelli F
        Axillary lymphadenopathy at the time of COVID-19 vaccination: ten recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
        Insights Imaging. 2021; 12: 119https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01062-x
        • Park SH
        • Jeong YM
        • Cho SH
        • Jung HK
        • Kim SJ
        • Ryu HS.
        Imaging findings of variable axillary mass and axillary lymphadenopathy.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40: 1934-1948https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.019
        • Xu G
        • Lu Y.
        COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination-Induced Lymphadenopathy Mimics Lymphoma Progression on FDG PET/CT.
        Clin Nucl Med. 2021; 46: 353-354https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003597
        • Baden LR
        • El Sahly HM
        • Essink B
        • Kotloff K
        • Frey S
        • Novak R
        • Diemert D
        • Spector SA
        • Rouphael N
        • Creech CB
        • McGettigan J
        • Khetan S
        • Segall N
        • Solis J
        • Brosz A
        • Fierro C
        • Schwartz H
        • Neuzil K
        • Corey L
        • Gilbert P
        • Janes H
        • Follmann D
        • Marovich M
        • Mascola J
        • Polakowski L
        • Ledgerwood J
        • Graham BS
        • Bennett H
        • Pajon R
        • Knightly C
        • Leav B
        • Deng W
        • Zhou H
        • Han S
        • Ivarsson M
        • Miller J
        • Zaks T
        • Group CS
        Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.
        N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 403-416https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
        • Polack FP
        • Thomas SJ
        • Kitchin N
        • Absalon J
        • Gurtman A
        • Lockhart S
        • Perez JL
        • G Pérez Marc
        • Moreira ED
        • Zerbini C
        • Bailey R
        • Swanson KA
        • Roychoudhury S
        • Koury K
        • Li P
        • Kalina WV
        • Cooper D
        • Frenck RW
        • Hammitt LL
        • Ö Türeci
        • Nell H
        • Schaefer A
        • Ünal S
        • Tresnan DB
        • Mather S
        • Dormitzer PR
        • Şahin U
        • Jansen KU
        • Gruber WC
        • Group CCT
        Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2603-2615https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
        • Mehta N
        • Sales RM
        • Babagbemi K
        • Levy AD
        • McGrath AL
        • Drotman M
        • Dodelzon K.
        Unilateral axillary Adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccine.
        Clin Imaging. 2021; 75: 12-15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.016
        • Keshavarz P
        • Yazdanpanah F
        • Rafiee F
        • Mizandari M.
        Lymphadenopathy Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Imaging Findings Review.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1058-1071https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.04.007
        • Faermann R
        • Nissan N
        • Halshtok-Neiman O
        • Shalmon A
        • Gotlieb M
        • Yagil Y
        • Samoocha D
        • Friedman E
        • Sklair-Levy M.
        COVID-19 Vaccination Induced Lymphadenopathy in a Specialized Breast Imaging Clinic in Israel: Analysis of 163 cases.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1191-1197https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.06.003
        • Özütemiz C
        • Krystosek LA
        • Church AL
        • Chauhan A
        • Ellermann JM
        • Domingo-Musibay E
        • Steinberger D.
        Lymphadenopathy in COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients: Diagnostic Dilemma in Oncology Patients.
        Radiology. 2021; 210275https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210275
        • Nguyen DL
        • Ambinder EB
        • Myers KS
        • Mullen LA
        • Panigrahi B
        • Oluyemi E.
        COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Axillary Adenopathy on Breast Imaging: Follow-Up Recommendations and Histopathologic Findings.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022; 218: 997-998https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.27162
        • Horvat JV
        • Morris EA
        • Bernard-Davila B
        • Martinez DF
        • Leithner D
        • Ochoa-Albiztegui RE
        • Thakur SB
        Pinker K. MRI evaluation of axillary and intramammary lymph nodes in the postoperative period.
        Breast J. 2019; 25: 916-921https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13355
        • Luciani A
        • Pigneur F
        • Ghozali F
        • Dao TH
        • Cunin P
        • Meyblum E
        • De Baecque-Fontaine C
        • Alamdari A
        • Maison P
        • Deux JF
        • Lagrange JL
        • Lantieri L
        • Rahmouni A.
        Ex vivo MRI of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.
        Eur J Radiol. 2009; 69: 59-66https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.040
        • Korteweg MA
        • Zwanenburg JJ
        • Hoogduin JM
        • van den Bosch MA
        • van Diest PJ
        • van Hillegersberg R
        • Eijkemans MJ
        • Mali WP
        • Luijten PR
        • Veldhuis WB.
        Dissected sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients: characterization with high-spatial-resolution 7-T MR imaging.
        Radiology. 2011; 261: 127-135https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11103535
      6. Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
        2023 (January 09)
      7. Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
        2023 (January 09)
        • Horvat JV
        • Sevilimedu V
        • Becker AS
        • Perez-Johnston R
        • Yeh R
        • Feigin KN.
        Frequency and outcomes of MRI-detected axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination.
        Eur Radiol. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08655-0
        • Wolfson S
        • Kim E
        • Plaunova A
        • Bukhman R
        • Sarmiento RD
        • Samreen N
        • Awal D
        • Sheth MM
        • Toth HB
        • Moy L
        • Reig B.
        Axillary Adenopathy after COVID-19 Vaccine: No Reason to Delay Screening Mammogram.
        Radiology. 2022; 303: 297-299https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.213227
        • Antwi K
        • Caobelli F
        • Kudura K
        • Buchholz HG
        • Hoffmann M
        • Schreckenberger M.
        Hypermetabolic Ipsilateral Supraclavicular and Axillary Lymphadenopathy: Optimal Time Point for Performing an.
        Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123073
        • Maimone S
        • Robinson KA
        • Advani PP
        • Li Z
        • Gococo-Benore DA
        • Qosja N
        • Ashai AM
        • Mummareddy A
        • Chumsri S.
        Limiting Screening Mammography Recalls for Vaccine-Induced Adenopathy, a Single Institution Experience.
        Acad Radiol. 2022; 29: 1480-1485https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.028
        • Raj S
        • Ogola G
        • Han J.
        COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Subclinical Axillary Lymphadenopathy on Screening Mammogram.
        Acad Radiol. 2022; 29: 501-507https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.11.010
        • Becker AS
        • Perez-Johnston R
        • Chikarmane SA
        • Chen MM
        • El Homsi M
        • Feigin KN
        • Gallagher KM
        • Hanna EY
        • Hicks M
        • Ilica AT
        • Mayer EL
        • Shinagare AB
        • Yeh R
        • Mayerhoefer ME
        • Hricak H
        • Vargas HA.
        Multidisciplinary Recommendations Regarding Post-Vaccine Adenopathy and Radiologic Imaging.
        Radiology. 2021; 210436https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210436
        • Seely JM
        • Barry MH.
        The Canadian Society of Breast Imaging/Canadian Association of Radiologists' Recommendations for the Management of Axillary Adenopathy in Patients With Recent COVID-19 Vaccination.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021; 846537121998949https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537121998949
        • Grimm L
        • Srini A
        • Dontchos B
        • Daly C
        • Tuite C
        • Sonnenblick E
        • Milch H
        • Net J
        • Dodelzon K
        • Yang R
        • Goudreau S
        • Jacobs S
        • Dialani V
        • Kacharia V.
        Revised SBI Recommendations for the Management of Axillary Adenopathy in Patients with Recent COVID-19 Vaccination.
        2023 (Updated February 2022. Accessed)
        • Mortazavi S.
        Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccination Associated Axillary Adenopathy: Imaging Findings and Follow-Up Recommendations in 23 Women.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25651
        • Duke H
        • Posch L
        • Green L.
        Axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination: A single institution case series.
        Clin Imaging. 2021; 80: 111-116https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.05.023
        • Hl C
        • Gj W
        • Jwt L
        • J S
        • Lp M
        • Ht LP
        Ultrasound Features to Differentiate COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Benign Adenopathy from Breast Cancer Related Malignant Adenopathy.
        Acad Radiol. 2022; 29: 1004-1012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.02.015
        • van Nijnatten TJA
        • Jochelson MS
        • Lobbes MBI.
        Axillary lymph node characteristics in breast cancer patients versus post-COVID-19 vaccination: Overview of current evidence per imaging modality.
        Eur J Radiol. 2022; 152110334https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110334