The problem of lack of diversity in radiology, manifested by proportional under representation
of women and other groups underrepresented in medicine (URiMs), including American
Indian or Alaska Native, Black or African American, Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish
origin and native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander populations, has been recognized
for almost a decade. Unfortunately, as Oates et al.
1
document in their article, very little progress has been made over that time in correcting
this problem. Several radiology societies have started to address this issue,
2
including the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD). The Equity
and Inclusion Committee of SCARD has developed a Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)
dashboard in order to provide academic departments who are attempting to improve the
diversity of their programs a way of measuring their progress and comparing it to
benchmarks. The reasons for this initiative and the resulting DEI dashboard are described
in the article. The importance of metrics has been documented in two recent articles
on the subject,
3
,
- Choe A.I.
- Krause K.
- Costigan H.
- et al.
Current perception of diversity in academic radiology: a mixed methods study of radiology
program directors.
Acad Radiol. 2022; (S1076-6332(22)00477-9)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.022
4
so this tool will undoubtedly be of value. Although the dashboard may appear somewhat
daunting to a department starting out on a program to improve diversity, the authors
emphasize that a department could start by measuring just a few metrics that are most
relevant to its situation. They also provide references to descriptions of successful
programs which have already been undertaken by some academic departments which could
provide useful models. A number of strategies have also been studied and recommended
for improving diversity and equity in departments.
2
,
5
Abbreviations:
URiMs (groups underrepresented in medicine), DEI (Diversity, Equity & Inclusion)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
Oates ME.
- Multilevel approach to support diversity, equity and inclusion in radiology.Acad Radiol. 2022; 22: 1-7
- Current perception of diversity in academic radiology: a mixed methods study of radiology program directors.Acad Radiol. 2022; (S1076-6332(22)00477-9)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.022
- Views of diagnostic radiology residency program directors regarding methods to increase female and under-represented in medicine residents: a cross-sectional study.Acad Radiol. 2023; 30: 541-547
- Recruiting future radiologists: how can we do better?.Acad Radiol. 2020; 27: 1311-1315
- National survey to assist gender, racial, and ethnic differences among radiology residency applicants regarding factors impacting program selection.Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1410-1423
- LGBTQ+ physicians: history, progress, and recommendations for a better future.Acad Med. 2022; 97: 9-10
Article info
Publication history
Published online: April 14, 2023
Accepted:
March 25,
2023
Received:
March 24,
2023
Identification
Copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Association of University Radiologists