Advertisement
Original Investigation|Articles in Press

Distribution and Disparities of Industry Payments to Radiologists (2016-2020)

      Background

      The frequency, magnitude, and distribution of industry payments to radiologists are not well understood.

      Rationale and Objectives

      The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of industry payments to physicians working in diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and radiation oncology, study the categories of payments and determine their correlation.

      Materials and Methods

      The Open Payments Database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was accessed and analyzed for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. Payments were grouped into six categories: consulting fees, education, gifts, research, speaker fees, and royalties/ownership. The total amount and types of industry payments going to the top 5% group were determined overall and for each category of payment.

      Results

      From 2016 to 2020, a total of 513 020 payments, amounting to $370 782 608, were made to 28 739 radiologists suggesting that approximately 70% of the 41 000 radiologists in the US received at least one industry payment during the 5-year period. The median payment value was $27 (IQR: $15-$120) and the median number of payments per physician over the 5-year period was 4 (IQR: 1-13). Gifts were the most frequent payment type made (76.4%), but accounted for only 4.8% of payment value. The median total value of payments earned by members of the top 5% group over the 5-year period was $58 878 (IQR: $29 686-$162 425) ($11 776 per year) compared to $172 (IQR: $49-877) ($34 per year) in the bottom 95% group. Members of the top 5% group received a median of 67 (IQR: 26-147) individual payments (13 payments per year) while members of the bottom 95% group received a median of 3 (IQR: 1-11) (0.6 payments per year).

      Conclusion

      Between 2016 and 2020, industry payments to radiologists were highly concentrated both in terms of number/frequency and value of payments.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      IQR (Interquartile range)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Steinbrook R.
        Industry payments to physicians and prescribing of brand-name drugs.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 1123
        • Perlis R.H.
        • Perlis C.S.
        Physician payments from industry are associated with greater medicare part D prescribing costs.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11e0155474
        • Bailey C.S.
        • Fehlings M.G.
        • Rampersaud Y.R.
        • et al.
        Industry and evidence-based medicine: believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature.
        Can J Surg. 2011; 54: 321-326
      1. Open Payments. Available at: 〈https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/〉, 2022. Accessed date December 1, 2022.

        • Harvey H.B.
        • Alkasab T.K.
        • Pandharipande P.V.
        • et al.
        Non-research-related physician-industry relationships of radiologists in the United States.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12: 1142-1150
        • Kokabi N.
        • Junn J.C.
        • Xing M.
        • et al.
        Nonresearch industry payments to radiologists: characteristics and associations with regional medical imaging utilization.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 418-425
        • Jutras M.
        • Khosa F.
        The Physician Payment Sunshine Act: evaluating industrial payments in radiology.
        Acad Radiol. 2019; 26: 86-92
        • Inoue K.
        • Blumenthal D.M.
        • Elashoff D.
        • et al.
        Association between physician characteristics and payments from industry in 2015-2017: observational study.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e031010
      2. ACR Fact Sheet. Available at: 〈https://www.acr.org/About-ACR/Fact-Sheet〉, 2022. Accessed date December 1, 2022.

      3. Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2019. Available at: 〈https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019〉, 2022. Accessed date December 1, 2022.

        • Han M.
        • Hogan S.O.
        • Holmboe E.
        • et al.
        Trends in industry payments to physicians in the first 6 years after graduate medical training.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e2237574
        • Zhang A.D.
        • Anderson T.S.
        Comparison of industry payments to physicians and advanced practice clinicians.
        JAMA. 2022; 328: 2452-2455
        • Eusemann C.D.
        • Sammons B.E.
        • Holmes 3rd, D.R.
        • et al.
        Academic technology transfer and radiology: a strong partnership for the future.
        Acad Radiol. 2007; 14: 1289-1295
        • Kwee R.M.
        • Kwee T.C.
        Health care industry payments to editorial board members of imaging-related journals.
        Radiology. 2022; 303: 399-403
        • Janssen S.J.
        • Langerhuizen D.W.G.
        • Kerkhoffs G.
        • et al.
        Payments by industry to residency program directors in the United States: a cross-sectional study.
        Acad Med. 2022; 97: 278-285
        • Deipolyi A.R.
        • Becker A.S.
        • Covey A.M.
        • et al.
        Gender disparity in industry relationships with academic interventional radiology physicians.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 215: 494-501
      4. Open Payments. Available at: 〈https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/summary〉. Accessed April 16, 2023.