Table of Contents page: Academic Radiology

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes

Centering the Patient in Radiology Research

Norman B. Thomson III

Published online: November 13, 2015

p1-2

The “Unconference” in Radiological Society Meetings

Andrew B. Rosenkrantz,
Srini Tridandapani

Published online: November 02, 2015

p3-5

Clinical Radiology and Radiology Research in a Sea of Change

William F. Auffermann,
Srini Tridandapani

Published online: November 06, 2015

p6-7

Opportunities for Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Radiology

Matthew E. Zygmont,
Diana L. Lam,
Kristina M. Nowitzki,
...
Tatum A. McArthur,
Aarti K. Sekhar,
Jason N. Itri

Published online: October 22, 2015

p8-17

Value of Imaging Part I:

Phuong-Anh T. Duong,
Brian Bresnahan,
David A. Pastel,
...
Joseph C. Sullivan,
Karen Buch,
Richard Duszak Jr.

Published online: November 09, 2015

p18-22

The Value of Imaging Part II: Value beyond Image Interpretation

Phuong-Anh T. Duong,
David A. Pastel,
Gelareh Sadigh,
...
Brian Bresnahan,
Karen Buch,
Richard Duszak Jr

Published online: November 09, 2015

p23-29

Big Data and the Future of Radiology Informatics

Akash P. Kansagra,
John-Paul J. Yu,
Arindam R. Chatterjee,
...
Martin Oselkin,
Pushpender Gupta,
Sayed Ali

Published online: November 05, 2015

p30-42

Research Challenges and Opportunities for Clinically Oriented Academic Radiology Departments

Summer J. Decker,
Joseph R. Grajo,
Todd R. Hazelton,
...
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz,
Christopher G. Roth,
Robert J. Ward

Published online: November 16, 2015

p43-52

Anisotropy of Solid Breast Lesions in 2D Shear Wave Elastography is an Indicator of Malignancy

Katrin Skerl,
Sarah Vinnicombe,
Kim Thomson,
Denis McLean,
Elisabetta Giannotti,
Andrew Evans

Published online: November 09, 2015

p53-61

Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy

Elizabeth S. Burnside,
Jie Liu,
Yirong Wu,
...
Terrie Kitchner,
Jun Fan,
Ming Yuan

Published online: October 27, 2015

p62-69

Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists

Christine N. Damases,
Patrick C. Brennan,
Claudia Mello-Thoms,
Mark F. McEntee

Published online: October 27, 2015

p70-77

Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method:

Tulika Singh,
Madhurima Sharma,
Veenu Singla,
Niranjan Khandelwal

Published online: October 27, 2015

p78-83

Predicting High Imaging Utilization Based on Initial Radiology Reports:

Saeed Hassanpour,
Curtis P. Langlotz

Published online: October 27, 2015

p84-89

RadPath:

Corey W. Arnold,
W. Dean Wallace,
Shawn Chen,
...
Scott Binder,
Denise Aberle,
Dieter Enzmann

Published online: October 27, 2015

p90-100

Gender Bias in Diagnostic Radiology Resident Selection, Does it Exist?

Lara Hewett,
Madelene Lewis,
Heather Collins,
Leonie Gordon

Published online: November 25, 2015

p101-107

Respiratory Disease

Richard B. Gunderman,
Brandt T. Lydon

Published online: October 16, 2015

p108-111

Overdiagnosis Detrimental, Resection Consequential, NLST Challengeable

Jerome Mark Reich,
Jong S. Kim

Published online: October 22, 2015

p112-113

Overdiagnosis in Lung Cancer Screening can be Reduced to a Low, Manageable Level via a Multilayered Strategy Involving Perfecting Reporting Systems, Restricting Screening to High-Risk Groups, Developing Better Risk Stratification Models, and Improving Management Algorithms

Eduardo J. Mortani Barbosa Jr.

Published online: October 27, 2015

p113-115

In Estimating Overdiagnosis, Details Matter

Jay A. Baker

Published online: October 27, 2015

p115-116

The Faulty Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening Data

Daniel B. Kopans

Published online: November 16, 2015

p116-117

Response to “Screening Mammography: Update and Review of Publications Since Our Report in the New England Journal of Medicine on the Magnitude of the Problem in the United States”

Dana H. Smetherman

Published online: October 23, 2015

p117-118

Requested Education on Screening Mammography

Elizabeth Kagan Arleo

Published online: October 23, 2015

p118

Screening Mammography: Update and Review of Publications Since Our Report in the New England Journal of Medicine on the Magnitude of the Problem in the United States

Archie Bleyer

Published online: November 05, 2015

p119-123

Screening Mammography:

Amy M. Fowler

Published online: October 27, 2015

p123-124

Screening Mammography Would Have Been Initiated Regardless of the CNBSS

Sarah M. Friedewald

Published online: October 27, 2015

p124

Letter to the Editor in Response to a Recent Commentary, “Mammography Trials” by Drs. Saurabh Jha and Jeffrey B. Ware

Linda Moy

Published online: October 27, 2015

p124-125

Overemphasis on Overdiagnosis

Elissa R. Price

Published online: November 02, 2015

p125-126

Mammogram Tribulations

Saurabh Jha,
Jeffrey Ware

Published online: November 10, 2015

p126-127

An Aneurysm by Any Other Name

Ryan T. Fitzgerald

Published online: November 13, 2015

p127-128

Nomenclature:

Ian Amber,
Suyash Mohan,
Paolo Nucifora

Published online: November 16, 2015

p128-129

January 2016

Radiology Research Alliance Guest Editorial

Radiology Research Alliance Perspective

Radiology Research Alliance Introduction

Radiology Research Alliance

Perspectives for the Academic Radiologist

Original Investigations

Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories

A Feasibility Study of Machine Learning

Technical Report

A Web-based System for Integrating and Correlating Radiology and Pathology Findings During Cancer Diagnosis

Radiologic Education

Educational Perspective

An Update for Radiologists

Letters to the Editor

More Than Just One Trial

The Nidus for Change